Showing posts with label astronomical chronology Jesus Christ. Show all posts
Showing posts with label astronomical chronology Jesus Christ. Show all posts

Monday, July 5, 2010

Cosmic Liturgy of Revelation

SATURDAY, JUNE 26, 2010

Archbishop Chaput: Liturgical renewal should create martyrs’ love for the Mass
The following comes from the CNA:

Christian witness is intended to prepare for and to live the “cosmic liturgy” in which all mankind adores God, Archbishop Charles J. Chaput declared in a lecture on Thursday evening. Noting the cultural obstacles to liturgical understanding, he said the renewed liturgy should create Christians who would die rather than not celebrate Mass.

Delivering the Hildebrand Distinguished Lecture at the Liturgical Institute of the University of St. Mary of the Lake in Illinois, the Archbishop of Denver praised Chicago’s “historic role” in the renewal of the liturgy and the evangelization of America. He said the 10th anniversary of the Liturgical Institute shows that this legacy continues.

He opened with a reflection on the respected liturgist and theologian Fr. Romano Guardini. Soon after the Second Vatican Council published its “groundbreaking” document on the liturgy, “Sacrosanctum Concilium,” the priest sent a letter to the Third German Liturgical Conference wondering whether man in an industrial and scientific age is “no longer capable of the liturgical act.”

“I think he put his finger on one of the key questions of mission in his time, and also in ours,” Archbishop Chaput remarked, explaining that the liturgical act is the transformation of personal prayer and piety into “genuine corporate worship” and “the public service that the Church offers to God.”

This act requires an inward awareness of the unity of the whole person, body and soul, with the spiritual body of the Church, present in heaven and on earth, he added.

“It also requires an appreciation that the sacred signs and actions of the Mass -- standing, kneeling, singing and so forth -- are themselves ‘prayer’.”

However, he warned, this awareness is obscured in a society organized around a “narrow” vision of technological progress in which truth is judged by what can be perceived and verified through research and experiment.

“In practice, almost nothing of what we believe as Catholics is affirmed by our culture,” commented the archbishop. “Even the meaning of the words ‘human’ and ‘person’ are subject to debate.”

This has implications for Catholic worship in which we profess to be in contact with “spiritual realities” and to receive the true Body and Blood of the Lord.

“We preach the good news that this world has a Savior who can free us from the bondage of sin and death. What can our good news mean in a world where people don’t believe in sin or that there is anything they need to be saved from?” Archbishop Chaput asked. “What does the promise of victory over death mean to people who don’t believe in the existence of any reality beyond this visible world?”

The archbishop said Chicago priest Fr. Robert Barron is one of the few to have wrestled with such issues. For him, the liturgy is not to be shaped according to modern suppositions; rather, the liturgy should “question and shape the suppositions of any age.” While modern man is probably incapable of the liturgical act, this is no grounds for despair. Instead, we should “let the liturgy be itself,” the priest has said.

Archbishop Chaput agreed with Fr. Barron that in recent decades the “professional liturgical establishment” chose to shape the liturgy according to the world, which has proven to be “a dead end.” Seeking relevance through “a kind of relentless cult of novelty” has only resulted in confusion and division between the faithful and the true spirit of the liturgy, continued the archbishop.

He said liturgical renewal should build “an authentic Eucharistic culture” to instill “a new sacramental and liturgical sensibility that enables Catholics to face the idols and suppositions of our culture with the confidence of believers who draw life from the sacred mysteries ...”

To this end, the Archbishop of Denver offered several suggestions: the need to recover the “intrinsic and inseparable connection” between liturgy and evangelization; the need to see the liturgy as a participation in the “liturgy of heaven” where Christians worship “in Spirit and truth” with the Church and the communion of the saints; and the need to recover and live the early Christians’ “vibrant liturgical and evangelical spirituality.”

“Liturgy is both the source of the Church’s mission and its goal,” explained the prelate. “The reason we evangelize is in order to bring people into communion with the living God in the Eucharistic liturgy. And this experience of communion with God, in turn, impels us to evangelize.”

The “pedestrian” and self-focused nature of many contemporary liturgies results from the loss of the sense of this participation in the heavenly liturgy, he suggested.

“The Eucharist … is a cosmic liturgy that unites the worship of heaven with our own worship here on earth… Heaven and earth are filled with the glory of God,” he continued. Worship is a window through which “the reality and destiny of our lives is glimpsed.”

This truth should “make us strive for liturgies that are reverent and beautiful, and that point our hearts and minds to things above.” The ultimate purpose of Christian witness is to “prepare the way for the cosmic liturgy in which all humanity will adore the Creator.”

The archbishop encouraged the faithful to look to the early Christians, who found their identity in the liturgy and said “we cannot live without the Mass.”

“This is the kind of faith that should inspire our worship. And this is the kind of faith that our worship should inspire. Can we really say today that we’re ready to die rather than not celebrate the Mass?”

Describing the liturgy as “a school of sacrificial love,” he said that all Christians should see themselves as a Eucharistic offering, “a perfect offering holy and acceptable to God.”

“The liturgical act becomes possible for modern man when you make your lives a liturgy, when you live your lives liturgically -- as an offering to God in thanksgiving and praise for his gifts and salvation. You are the future of the liturgical renewal.”

Archbishop Chaput closed his lecture with the words of one of the dismissal prayers of the new Roman Missal: “Go in peace, glorifying the Lord by your life.”

To read Archbishop Chaput's full lecture, click here.
POSTED BY PADRE STEVE AT 10:10 AM
LABELS: ARCHBISHOP CHAPUT, LITURGY


Taken from: http://salesianity.blogspot.com/2010/06/archbishop-chaput-liturgical-renewal.html

Monday, August 31, 2009

Scott Hahn's Version of the Book of Revelation









































































+ Click for larger image


Have you ever tried reading the Book of Revelation? Do you know how to properly interpret its mysterious imagery and mystifying theology? Unfortunately, most of us get bogged down in the details and fail to appreciate the profound insights contained in this enigmatic book. But you can change all this with the classic 12 CD series The End: A Study in the Book of Revelation, and its brand new 170-page study guide!

Discover Critical Interpretive Keys

With The End, you'll join Dr. Scott Hahn in an intense verse-by-verse study of the New Testament's most prophetic book. And rather than reading it apart from the rest of the Bible, you'll discover how the Apocalypse contains many of the critical interpretive keys necessary to understanding the entire Gospel! You'll learn why Revelation is the ultimate "unveiling" whereby the Lord of the Universe reveals Himself to His Bride, the Church. And how its twenty-two chapters are a timely and timeless message of hope for believers suffering persecution and for those others struggling not to lose faith.

With scholarly precision, Dr. Hahn examines the various ways that Protestants and Catholics understand the Book of Revelation, revealing how the prophecies of the Book of Revelation were first realized in the first-century transition from the Old Covenant to the New. And how these prophecies ultimately point to a future fulfillment when all of God's creation will give way to a "new heaven and a new earth" when Christ Jesus will triumphantly return to judge the living and the dead.

Open Up New Avenues of Understanding

Unlocking the secrets contained in this final and most difficult book of the Bible has never been easier with The End: A Study in the Book of Revelation audio series and study guide! Dr. Hahn's clear and comprehensive analysis opens up new avenues of understanding and spiritual insight into God's covenantal love, the infinite value of the Mass, the powerful intercession of the Saints, the critical role of the Blessed Virgin Mary and significant details concerning the end of the world. Purchase your set and study guide today and don't get "left behind!"

LEARN

  • Who wrote the Book of Revelation according to both internal and external evidence
  • How the Fathers of the Church understood the Book of Revelation, especially in regards to the end times
  • How Christians should properly understand "eschatology"
  • What make up the fundamental characteristics of apocalyptic literature
  • How to interpret Old Testament prophecy in light of the New Testament revelation
  • The four principal ways Catholics and Protestants use to interpret this mysterious Biblical book
  • How to understand the numerous "time indicators" contained in Revelation
  • Why the Holy Sacrifice of the Mass is a truly foretaste of heavenly worship.

Name/Title: The End - A Study on the Book of Revelation
Item #: GF8001379
Author: Scott Hahn
See options for pricing!

Friday, May 15, 2009

Need for 'Semitic Mentality' to Comprehend Book of Revelation

Since the Scriptures were written for all nations and for all ages, their main essential truths reveal themselves in such distinct and unambiguous terms that men and women of good will, will always recognise them and embrace them. But when we seek for the full force and meaning of each particular passage of Scripture, within its proper context, we are grateful to those who, through careful scholarship and study of the ancient Near East, have brought us closer to the original times and circumstances of its authorship. For although, as said, the Bible has a universal application and relevance, it is very evident that it, written as it was by mainly Jewish (certainly Semitic) authors, primarily appeals and is intelligible to the middle eastern and Jewish cast of mind (cf. Romans 11:24).
Of course the human mind, in its fundamental nature and operations, does not differ from one person to the next; and that includes peoples as far removed as the East is from the West (Psalm 102:12). However there does appear to be, on average, a pronounced distinction in intellectual emphasis between the two: the eastern mind and the western. This interesting distinction is explained well by Professor Stalker (The Life of Jesus Christ, p. 65), who contrasts what we might call the more contemplative oriental cast of mind with the discursive, analytical western mind. “Our thinking and speaking when at their best”, he suggests, “are fluent, expansive, closely reasoned. The kind of discourse which we admire is one which takes up an important subject, divides it out into different branches, treats it fully under each of the heads, closely articulates part to part …”. By contrast, the oriental or Jewish mind, he says, “loves to brood long on a single point, to turn it round and round, to gather up all the truth about it into a focus, and pour it forth in a few pointed and memorable words. It is concise, epigrammatic, oracular”.
Whereas a western speaker’s discourse “is a systematic structure, or like a chain in which link is firmly knit to link”, according to Stalker, “an Oriental’s is like the sky at night, full of innumerable burning points shining forth from a dark background”. Because of this rather dramatic contrast between the application of the western and the eastern mind, the difficulty of translation, great in all cases, is especially great in translating from eastern to western languages. The methods of expression in eastern languages are much richer in metaphor and figure. And this is especially the case with the Hebrew language of the Jews, for the following reason given by M. Müller (as quoted by Mackinlay, op. cit., p. 51):

The strict monotheism of the Israelites discouraged the arts of the sculptor and artist, which flourished among the Egyptians, Babylonians and Greeks: there can be no doubt that the Hebrews possessed the artistic feeling, but the expression of it was chiefly confined to the use made of language; we find word-pictures, poetic images, metaphors and illustrations employed very freely in Scripture ….

Quite often, according to Müller, the Hebrew language makes use of a play on words “to fix attention”; enigmatical utterances occur, and at times statements are made purposely, “in a manner difficult to comprehend, as for instance in the case of the number of the beast” (Revelation 13:18).

....