by
Damien F. Mackey
“In 1967 a hoard of coins
that was said to have been illegally excavated
in the northern part of
the Judean desert surfaced on the antiquities market.
The hoard included
Bar-Kokhba coins and an Aelia Capitolina coin.
This seemed to indicate
that Aelia was founded before the revolt, since the refugees who supposedly hid
the coins during the revolt also had an Aelia coin”.
Hanan Eshel
The
very suggestion that there could have been a massive Jewish revolt against Rome
(c. 132-135 AD) a mere 60 years or so after the complete and utter destruction
of Jerusalem and its Temple by Titus and his legionaries, in 70 AD, I find
quite ridiculous.
According
to typical accounts, some half a million Jews may have died in this second
revolt. From whence did they all come? Judah, Jerusalem, the Temple, and
Judaïsm, were all finished in 70 AD. ‘Not a stone was left upon a stone!’ (Luke
21:6).
This
is the sad tale of it as foretold by the Lord of History (vv. 20-33):
‘When you see Jerusalem
being surrounded by armies, you will know that its desolation is
near. Then let those who are in Judea flee to the mountains, let those in
the city get out, and let those in the country not enter the city. For
this is the time of punishment in fulfillment of all that has been
written. How dreadful it will be in those days for pregnant women and
nursing mothers! There will be great distress in the land and wrath against
this people. They will fall by the sword and will be taken as prisoners to
all the nations. Jerusalem will be trampled on by the Gentiles until the
times of the Gentiles are fulfilled.
‘There will be
signs in the sun, moon and stars. On the earth, nations will be in anguish and
perplexity at the roaring and tossing of the sea. People will faint from
terror, apprehensive of what is coming on the world, for the heavenly bodies
will be shaken. At that time they will see the Son of Man coming in a
cloud with power and great glory. When these things begin to take
place, stand up and lift up your heads, because your redemption is drawing
near’.
He told them this
parable: ‘Look at the fig tree and all the trees. When they sprout
leaves, you can see for yourselves and know that summer is near. Even so,
when you see these things happening, you know that the kingdom of God is
near.
‘Truly I tell you, this
generation will certainly not pass away until all these things have
happened. Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away’.
As I wrote in my article:
Simon Bar Kochba in Temple Period - Correcting my former views
(6) Simon Bar Kochba in Temple Period - Correcting my former views
…. But the
most compelling argument in favour of a necessary (as I had thought)
synchronisation of the activities of Simon Bar Giora and Simon Bar Kochba was
that the destruction in Israel was so complete in the first case, at the hands
of Vespasian and Titus, with the entire land devastated, the great City
(Jerusalem) and its Temple completely burned to the ground, and the people
slaughtered wholesale, or sent into slavery, that I did not consider it
reasonable to suggest that, some 60-70 years later - {and again readers might
cite the recovery of nations much sooner after the First World War going in to
the Second – but these nations, e.g. Germany, had not been obliterated
internally} - Simon Bar Kochba was able to command armies of 400,000 men in
Israel against a Hadrian-led Rome and to have several of the most famous of all
the Roman legions on the verge of annihilation - only afterwards to see some
580,000 Jewish men die, almost 1000 fortified villages in Israel completely
devastated, once again, and the people, once again, slaughtered or taken into
captivity en masse. ….
These
are numbers both massive and completely unbelievable!
Quite
different from realism, however, is the account that we find in our text books.
Hadrian
and the Bar Kochba revolt, are considered to have followed the cataclysmic 70
AD event, as a Second Jewish Revolt - whereas they actually preceded it, Hadrian
in the Maccabean era.
You
see, Hadrian was not a Roman emperor at all, but was the Seleucid Greek tyrant,
Antiochus ‘Epiphanes’, who definitely did not live as late as c. 130 AD:
Antiochus ‘Epiphanes’ and Emperor Hadrian
(3) Antiochus
‘Epiphanes’ and Emperor Hadrian
Note
in the following article the admission that: “The Bar Kochba Revolt lacks the
eyewitness accounts, like Josephus, who chronicled the First Jewish Revolt
against Rome (A.D. 66-73)”.
Typically,
we read worrisome articles such as the following one by Mark Turnage:
Weekly Q&A: What was
the Bar Kochba Revolt? - CBN Israel
Weekly
Q&A: What was the Bar Kochba Revolt?
Posted
on June 23, 2023 By CBN Israel In Blog
Hope
stirred within Judaism sixty years after the fall of Jerusalem and the
destruction of its Temple. Perhaps this was the time when the Jews in the land
of Israel would finally remove Rome’s presence. The revolt broke out in A.D.
132. The Bar Kochba Revolt lacks the eyewitness accounts, like Josephus, who
chronicled the First Jewish Revolt against Rome (A.D. 66-73).
The
causes of the revolt are not entirely clear. Several factors seem to have
contributed to a second Jewish revolt in the land of Israel within a sixty-year
period. The Roman Emperor Hadrian banned circumcision in the year’s leading up
to the revolt.
His
ban against circumcision grew out of a general ban against male castration.
Romans
viewed the Jewish practice of circumcision as mutilation. Of course,
circumcision was the sign of the covenant between God and Abraham’s descendants
(Genesis 17).
The
ancient sources disagree whether Hadrian refounded Jerusalem as a Roman colony,
named Aelia Capitonlina, with a Temple to Jupiter, before or after the Bar
Kochba Revolt. If it happened prior to the revolt, it may have served as a
cause of the revolt.
The
Jews seem to have assumed this period would see the Temple of Jerusalem
rebuilt. After the destruction of the First Temple, the Temple of Solomon, the
Second Temple was built by Zerubbabel in Jerusalem. The Jews looked at this
earlier precedent as a pattern for God bringing about the rebuilding of the
Temple in their day. Some of the coins minted by the Jewish rebels depict the
façade of the Temple. Others bear the inscription “for the redemption of
Jerusalem.” The Jewish rebels anticipated their revolt would return Jerusalem
to the Jews, remove the Romans, and see the Temple rebuilt.
The
revolt receives its name from its leader, a charismatic, messianic figure
named, Shimon ben Kosiba. Rabbinic tradition relates how a great Sage of this
period, Rabbi Akiva, hailed Shimon as the Messiah, calling him bar Kochba (“son
of the star;” Numbers 24:17). After the failure of the revolt, the rabbis
referred to him as bar Koziba (“son of the lie”). Shimon took the title Nasi
Israel (Prince of Israel). This language comes from Ezekiel where the
future, hoped for ruler will be known as Nasi.
The
revolt had a devastating impact upon the Jewish community in the land of
Israel. Roman, Jewish, and Christian sources place the Jewish casualties
between 400,000-500,000.
Even
if these figures are inflated, they speak to the widespread loss of Jewish
life.
The
Jewish rebels also inflicted heavy causalities upon the Roman forces as well.
Many Jews were sold as slaves because of the revolt. Others emigrated outside
of the land. Jews from Babylon immigrated into the land of Israel at this time.
The
Romans changed the name of the province from Judaea to Palestina. Jerusalem
became a Roman colony and Jews were expelled from the city. The Galilee, which
had been a center of Jewish life, had idolatrous non-Jews settling in the
region. It also impacted the relationships between Jews and Christians.
[End of quote]
In
the next article, Hanan Eshel, also following a conventional route, will try to
determine when Hadrian set up his Aelia Capitolina:
‘Eshel.
“Aelia Capitolina- Jerusalem No More.” Biblical Archaeology Review 23, 6
(1997).
Unlike the First
Jewish Revolt against Rome (66–70 C.E.), which was chronicled in detail by the
first-century historian Josephus, the Second Jewish Revolt, the so-called
Bar-Kokhba Revolt (132–135 C.E.), is known only from scraps of ancient
literature. …. Archaeology alone can fill in the gaps. And it has been doing so
in an amazing way in recent decades.
….
One of the
mysteries surrounding the revolt involves the founding of the city Aelia
Capitolina, the name the Romans gave to Jerusalem. Did the Romans establish
Aelia Capitolina before the Bar-Kokhba Revolt, thereby inciting the Jews to
revolt? Or did they establish it after the revolt and exclude the Jews from the
city as punishment?
Scholars, as
might be expected, have taken two views. Recent numismatic evidence—coins from
the Judean desert—may provide the answer. The first view, that the founding of
Aelia Capitolina preceded the revolt, is supported by the Roman historian Dio
Cassius. In 130 C.E. Emperor Hadrian (117–138 C.E.) made a tour of his eastern
lands, traveling through Judea, Arabia and Egypt before returning to Rome.
According to Dio, Hadrian founded Aelia Capitolina during this journey. ….
The church
historian Eusebius, however, describes the transformation of Jerusalem into
Aelia Capitolina as occurring after the Bar-Kokhba Revolt was crushed, in 136
C.E. …. The Mishnah, the earliest rabbinic classic, redacted in about 200 C.E.,
seems to support Eusebius.
In Ta’anit 4.6,
the Mishnah lists five disasters that occurred on the ninth of the Hebrew month
of Av, including the Babylonian destruction of the First Temple and the Roman
destruction of the Second Temple. The fourth item in the list is the fall of
Betar, the last stronghold of Bar-Kokhba’s warriors, which ended the Second
Jewish Revolt.
The final item in
the Mishnah’s list is the plowing of “the city”—that is, Jerusalem. When the
Romans founded a city, they fixed its boundaries in a ceremonial ritual in
which an ox and a cow, tethered together, plowed a line that marked the new
city’s limits. That the Mishnah lists the fall of Betar before the founding of
Roman Jerusalem seems to confirm Eusebius’s statement that Aelia Capitolina was
founded after the Bar-Kokhba revolt was suppressed.
Who was right—Dio
Cassius or Eusebius?
Like the rebels
of the First Jewish Revolt, the Jews of the Second Jewish Revolt issued their
own coins. These may help us answer the question. The Second Revolt coins are
all overstrikes; that is, the rebels took coins then in circulation and
imprinted them with their own impressions. Rome issued coins commemorating
Aelia Capitolina. If an Aelia Capitolina coin had been found overstruck with a
Bar-Kokhba impression, this would provide clear evidence that Aelia had been
founded before the revolt. However, since no such coin has been found, some
scholars have assumed that Aelia was established after the revolt, as
punishment.
In 1967 a hoard
of coins that was said to have been illegally excavated in the northern part of
the Judean desert surfaced on the antiquities market. The hoard included
Bar-Kokhba coins and an Aelia Capitolina coin. This seemed to indicate that
Aelia was founded before the revolt, since the refugees who supposedly hid the
coins during the revolt also had an Aelia coin. Later, in 1970, hoards said to
have come from the same area appeared on the market. These too contained a
mixture of Bar-Kokhba and Aelia coins. As Yaakov Meshorer, the dean of Israeli
numismatists, noted, these discoveries seemed to support Dio’s testimony that
Aelia was founded in 130 C.E., during Hadrian’s eastern tour.
There was a
problem, however.
These hoards were
found not in professional digs but in illegal excavations. Local Bedouin
regularly engage in such digs and then sell their finds to antiquities dealers.
Some skeptical scholars have suggested that antiquities dealers may have added
the Aelia coins to the hoards to increase their value. I can now report the
controlled and legal excavation of a hoard of coins that may remove any doubts.
This excavation is really part of a larger story involving the search for and
excavation of caves in the Judean desert. Many of these caves were used by
Jewish refugees fleeing from the Roman forces during the Second Revolt.
….
Since 1951, 27
Second Revolt refugee caves have been identified. Eight of these caves have
been found by the Israel Cave Research Center (ICRC), established in 1979 by
the Israel Society for the Protection of Nature. All of these caves can be
dated to the Bar-Kokhba period by the finds—pottery, glass, keys, wooden combs
and bronze vessels as well as coins. In most of the caves, unfortunately,
archaeologists detected evidence of prior illegal excavation.
Nevertheless,
important finds awaited discovery.
In one cave that
was clearly a Jewish refuge during the revolt (the Araq el-Na’asaneh Cave),
ICRC volunteers found 16 silver denarii struck by the emperors Trajan (98–117
C.E.) and Hadrian, as well as one tridrachma from the Roman province of
Cappadocia.
Damien
Mackey’s comment:
Trajan and Hadrian I believe to have been just one and the same emperor:
Hadrianus Traianus Caesar – Trajan
transmutes to Hadrian
(4) Hadrianus
Traianus Caesar – Trajan transmutes to Hadrian
Hanan Eshel
continues:
This demonstrates
that the Jewish rebels did not overstrike all the coins they got hold of but
continued to use Roman coins bearing their original impressions. In 1986, I
excavated a cave (known as the Abi’or Cave) to which 38 people had fled. We
found their skeletons in the cave. They probably suffocated as a fire kindled
by the Romans at the entrance withdrew oxygen from the cave. Five documents
written on papyrus (three in Greek and two in Aramaic) indicate that the people
fled to the cave in 135 C.E. Some of these documents were found on a terrace
located at the entrance to the cave. However, the stratigraphy was reversed.
Usually, as archaeologists dig deeper, they reveal earlier and earlier strata,
or layers of occupation. But near the mouth of the Abi’or Cave, we found a
fourth-century B.C.E. document above three documents from the Roman period.
This indicates that some later occupants dumped the cave’s contents onto the
terrace, thereby turning the strata upside down.
Damien
Mackey’s comment:
Or, has the archaeology here simply been misconstrued?
The
interpretation of some of what follows I think may well be questionable.
Hanan Eshel
continues:
It is not
difficult to determine who did this: monks who lived in this cave during the
14th century. In 1987 I excavated another refugee cave, which yielded one
bronze coin that had been overstruck by the rebels and a silver dinar of
Hadrian, further proof that the rebels continued to use some regular Roman
coins.
In 1991 David
Amit, an archaeologist with the Israel Antiquities Authority, and I excavated a
cave that yielded a tetradrachma of Bar-Kokhba with the facade of the destroyed
[sic] Jerusalem Temple on the obverse. About 2,000 of these coins are known,
but this tetradrachma is the first to be discovered during a legal excavation.
We named the findspot the Cave of the Tetradrachma.
Finally, I come
to the el-Jai Cave, on the south side of Wadi Suweinet, northeast of Jerusalem.
I visited the cave several times, looking for artifacts from the Bar-Kokhba
Revolt, but found only some Early Bronze Age potsherds (c. 2000 B.C.E.). When I
led a group of students here in 1997, we found evidence of intensive illegal
excavations. Near one of the cave’s two entrances we noticed potsherds from the
second century C.E. Crawling into the inner part of the cave, we came upon
broken glass vessels, often found in destruction layers from the Bar-Kokhba
period. We also found two coins near the entrance to the cave’s huge hall and
three more inside. The oldest [sic] was a bronze coin of the Roman emperor
Domitian (81–96 C.E.), minted in Sebaste, with two countermarks (stamps) of the
Tenth Roman Legion. (This legion led the forces that suppressed the First
Jewish Revolt against Rome in the first century C.E.) The other four coins all
dated to the time of Hadrian. Three of these coins are critical to our discussion:
a city coin from Gaza, found in the huge hall, and two Aelia Capitolina coins,
from a tunnel leading into the hall.
The Gaza coin is
important because it can be dated precisely.
When Hadrian made
his eastern tour, he visited Gaza, an honor the city wanted to preserve in
memory forever. To do this, the Gazans recorded two dates on their coins: the
Gaza era (the number of years from the Roman liberation of the city in 61
B.C.E.) and the number of years after Hadrian’s visit. The inscription on the
Gaza coin from the el-Jai Cave tells us it was struck in year 5 after the visit
of Hadrian and year 194 of the Gaza era. This double date (the difference
between the two dates is seven or eight months) allows the coin to be dated to
the end of 133 C.E. or the beginning of 134 C.E. [sic]
One of the Aelia
Capitolina coins portrays, on its reverse, the ceremony of the founding of the
city as a Roman colony. The emperor appears plowing the boundary of the city
with an ox and a cow. The Latin inscription reads “COL[ONIA] AEL[IA]
KAPIT[OLINA], COND[IT],” or “Colony of Aelia Capitolina, founded.” In the
background is the legionary standard. The other Aelia coin depicts, on its
reverse, the head of Sabina, Hadrian’s wife, with the inscription “Sabina
Augusta.”
Both coins
strengthen the association of the founding of Aelia with Hadrian’s tour,
especially his visit to Jerusalem. If, as I believe, the Gaza coin was
deposited in the cave at the same time as the Aelia coins, Aelia must have been
founded by 133/4 C.E.
The Bar-Kokhba
Revolt lasted another year or so. Therefore Aelia must have been established
before, not after, the revolt. Dio Cassius was right. The establishment of
Jerusalem as a Roman colony named Aelia Capitolina was apparently one of the
causes of the Second [sic] Jewish Revolt against Rome.
One final insight
provided by the coins from this cave: Some scholars have argued that the rebels
had no commercial connections with people outside Judea during the revolt.
Their argument is based largely on the fact that coin hoards from the
Bar-Kokhba Revolt usually contain no Roman coins dating later than 132 C.E. The
coins from the el-Jai Cave disprove this contention. The Jews who fled to this
cave no earlier than 134 C.E. carried with them coins minted in 133/4
C.E.—during the revolt.
No comments:
Post a Comment